It was exciting for him, anyway. He was a big fan of the show and an even bigger fan of the actress. I smiled at his enthusiasm, but soon stopped smiling when he told me how the number came into his possession. He’d interviewed a candidate for an office job who’d previously worked as a PA at a talent agency. Her referees included clients she’d done particularly good work for, and as part of her application she’d given the Eastenders star’s phone number.
In a case like this we don’t need the law to tell us what’s right and wrong. Using this data for personal reasons completely unrelated to the original job application would have been ridiculously unprofessional and a clear violation of the actress’s privacy. It would have put his own job in jeopardy and also risked souring the job applicant’s relationship with her referee. Thankfully my friend snapped out of his fantasy before doing any damage. Recruiters and HR professionals aren’t doctors; they don’t have to take a Hippocratic oath but they do have to respect the people they work with and the information that comes their way. At Jane Systems we see evidence of that respect every day. We work with HR professionals throughout the public and private sectors and what consistently shines through isn’t just their respect for privacy, it’s the fact that this respect is woven into the fabric of their actions.
Right now that’s just as well. GDPR becomes law on Friday, and much of the casual rule-bending that characterizes bad practice will now have more serious and legally actionable consequences. We’ve already had a reminder this week of how star-struck fans can overstep the mark. Ed Sheeran’s treatment for […]